Emergence@ASU
  • Home
  • News
  • PI
  • Team
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Software
  • Photos
  • Media and Press
  • Contact

Biology Poised at Criticality

5/29/2018

1 Comment

 
In a new paper stemming from a complexity class taught by Sara Walker and Hyunju Kim, we find evidence that biological networks are critically poised between order and chaos. To quantify this effect, we measure the average sensitivity of 66 gene regulatory networks from a wide variety of living systems and find that the values cluster near the critical value of one. This suggests an adaptive advantage to balancing order and chaos: Living systems must be ordered enough to preserve information and maintain regularity but not so rigid that they cannot change and evolve. The fact that this applies across a wide swath of biological processes gives further credence to the idea that there are mathematical frameworks capable of capturing features general to all life.
Picture
Biological networks are close to critical sensitivity. (A) 66 published Boolean network models of genetic regulation (red) have sensitivity near the critical value of 1. The schematic depicts the sensitivity measure, equal to the average number of nodes whose states are changed at timestep t + 1 (green) when one node’s state is changed at timestep t (light blue). Also shown are sensitivities of random ensembles preserving various aspects of the original networks. Preserving only the number of edges and mean activity bias (gray) produces much more chaotic networks. Preserving the causal structure and activity bias of each node in the network (tan) produces sensitivity generally nearer to 1, and further restricting to have the same number of canalizing functions (yellow) is closer still. This indicates that the specific structure and types of Boolean functions beyond average connectivity are important to criticality. (B) Naive random Boolean network theory does not correctly predict average sensitivity for most biological network models. Plotting average sensitivities for each network and its random ensembles separately reveals that most networks have sensitivity that is significantly different from that predicted by various random ensembles. The mean and standard deviation for each ensemble is shown for 100 samples from each ensemble.
1 Comment
Esther H link
4/16/2021 06:05:35 pm

Thanks great posst

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    August 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Sara Imari Walker

    Assistant Professor
    Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science and the School of Earth and Space Exploration at Arizona State University

    Categories

    All
    Popular Press
    Publications
    Public Events
    Travel

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • News
  • PI
  • Team
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Software
  • Photos
  • Media and Press
  • Contact